Empty-shell project: budget spent, PDF wrappers handed out, and tomorrow they disappear. No history!

Photographer Review: claim about project reliability
Editorial Response
Participant trust should be based on real history and stability, not loud slogans. Here are facts:
1. 18 years in the industry. 35AWARDS did not appear from nowhere. The award grew from the professional 35PHOTO community, operating and developing since 2007. This is a large ecosystem with deep roots in world photography.
2. Twelfth marathon. We are currently running the 11th award and actively preparing the 12th. A project focused on quick cash could not run for more than a decade while scaling yearly.
3. Massive data volume. Over the years, the system processed hundreds of millions of votes. In the 10th award alone, there were 116 million ratings. This scale is impossible for a “garage project” — it requires serious IT infrastructure and long-term development.
4. Reputation asset. Our certificates are not “wrappers,” but documents confirming your place in an international ranking among 110,000+ participants from 175 countries. Authors use this recognition for years to support professional status with clients and galleries.
5. Annual results. Every year we publish catalogs with best works (10 editions already released), documenting contemporary photography and specific author achievements.
Conclusion: 35AWARDS is not a seasonal campaign, but a stable institution of talent recognition. Nearly two decades of 35PHOTO history and twelve years of award history are the best guarantee that your achievements stay valid. We are not disappearing; we continue building a large, independent platform for photographers worldwide.


